naïve realism
Most of us most of the time, live with the
unquestioned belief that the world looks as it does because that’s the way it
is.
One small step from this belief to another: “Other people
view the world much the way I do”.
These beliefs, which have been called naïve realism,
are essential to the sense of a reality we share with other people.
We hold a single interpretation of the world around
us and normally invest little efforts in generating plausible alternatives to it.
Incase of professional judgements, the belief that
others see the world much as do we do is reinforced everyday in multiple ways.
First, we share with our colleagues a common language
and set of rules about the considerations that should matter in our decisions.
We also have the reassuring experience of agreeing with
others on the absurdity of judgements with colleagues violates these rules.
We view the occasional disagreements with colleagues
as lapses of judgement on their part.
We have little opportunity to notice that our agreed-on
rules are vague, sufficient to eliminate some possibilities but not to specify
a shared positive response to a particular case. We can live comfortably with colleagues
without ever noticing that they actually do not see the world as we do.
learned from: Noise A Flaw in Human Judgement, Kahneman, Sibony, Sunstein
-- Why some members of the team/squad/pod don't challenge when see impediments?
- What stops servant leaders/line managers to talk?
